Whilst peak oil is a depressing issue, I am more affected by the recent Israel-Lebanon conflict. I just don’t understand why.
I remembered a year ago when Syria pulled out of Lebanon after Rafik Hariri’s assasination - there wre celebrations everywhere. Finally - amongst all the tragedy that we’ve had the past few years a nation is free, the people have the freedom of choice, and amongst all those that did not work, this may be the beginning of something great. I was so touched by Hariri’s determination to free his own country, and though he did not see it, it was eventually - and I’d think that that in itself would be a great inspiration for its people to choose to live possibly a better and happier life than being oppressed.
And here we are, a year later, and we’ve got Lebanon’s Nasrallah poking into the back pocket of Israel. Don’t you have something better to do, like maybe rebuilding your country, maybe capitalizing on that extremely high oil price, or maybe even putting through some funds to your people? Instead, he’s ordered his soldiers to cross the border, capture two Israeli soliders. I mean, what was the point of that? I certainly hope this isn’t a play of the male ego.
Now, I’m not an Israeli advocate, or Lebanese, Iranian or Syrian. What I am, however, an advocate of peace. I was surprised, but impressed when Israel withdrew from the West Bank - finally, the Palestinians will have a chance in what may be their own world. I expected some peace and respect for each other. As to the reason why Palestinians are still suicide bombing, I have no idea. I mean, who does this - killing innocent people, demanding the world - in the name of what?
When you call your neighbours “Religious Zionists” but then you turn around and pull a bomb that kills yourself and people around you (kids included), what are you? How do you qualify to be a non-zionist? That all sounds like crazy talk to me.
Just in case if we didn’t know how many bombings are going on, or didn’t know geographically where we’re talking about -

(From The Economist)
That’s a lot of bombing for a small area.
What good can come out of it? Especially now that Syria may join in the party - are we back at square one? And Iran with its nukes, I mean, come on, are we really that unhappy? Is this because of religion, or is there something more?
Sometimes I think that it’s a pity that the person who calls the shots in a war isn’t actually in it. I mean, if you want to prove a point, what’s better than showing up yourself? No guerilla tactics, no nukes, no suicide bombings. Fewer casualties (I might also note that if Lebanon had provoked this war, it has lost a lot more of its citizens than Israel), less money spent, shorter time in conflict. It’s just so much more efficient. The battleground should be this - the two people who call the shots behind a conflict should show up on a vast piece of land with no weapons, at the same time. Then they should just fight it out. If you haven’t got the brains to figure out that wars kill people, children, and everything that generations have gone through to achieve, then you better had enough brawn.
Currently drinking Hardy’s Oomoo McLaren Vale Shiraz (2005)